Ignorant Vishal’s comparison of Kangana with Bhagat Singh

by B. R. GOWANI

Bhagat Singh was a revolutionary leader who fought for India’s freedom from British rule PHOTO/Archive/TeleSur

Tamil actor Vishal is impressed by actress Kangana Ranaut

this drama queen tries to be in the news all the time

Vishal compared her petty clashes with that of Bhagat Singh

“Dear Kangana, Hats off to your Guts, you have never thought twice to voice out what is right & what is wrong. It wasn’t your personal issue, but even then facing the wrath of the Government, you stayed strong which makes it a very big example. It’s something Similar to what Bhagat Singh did in the 1920s.This will set an example for people to speak against the Govt when something is not right and not necessarily being a Celebrity but also as a Common Man. Freedom of Speech (Article 19) Kudos to you, I Bow to you….GB”(sic).

when Vishal says “government,” it’s not the national government

he’s talking about the State of Maharashtra government

Singh (1907-1931) was a revolutionary, and fought against the British rule

Kangana supports the ruling oppressor Modi, the Muslims’ murderer

Kangana would be a heroine if she was fighting the government

Kangana is a hate spreader who loves to hate

Singh was a man with a vision, when he was 17, he wrote:

“All of us being one and none is the other. It will really be a comforting time when the world will have no strangers.”

Kangana’s vision is to create more divisions in a divided world

commenting on Indian filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt’s film she wrote:

“Why Pankistani [sic] pimps are allowed to spread religious hatred and prejudices in Bharat [i.e., India]?”

Bhatt, like many others, wants India/Pakistan to have good relations

Bhatt’s movie Sadak 2 had nothing to do with Pakistan

fanatic Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi doesn’t want that

Modi must be happy that Kangana is doing free service for him

Bhagat Singh was an atheist and a man of high principles

the following extract from Why I am an Atheist makes it clear

“I was completely innocent, but I believed that the police had sufficient power to do it if they desired it to be so. The same day some police officers persuaded me to offer my prayers to God two times regularly. I was an atheist. I thought that I would settle it to myself whether I could brag only in days of peace and happiness that I was an atheist, or in those hard times I could be steadfast in my convictions. After a long debate with myself, I reached the conclusion that I could not even pretend to be a believer nor could I offer my prayers to God. No, I never did it. It was time of trial and I would come out of it successful. These were my thoughts. Never for a moment did I desire to save my life. So I was a true atheist then and I am an atheist now. It was not an easy task to face that ordeal. Beliefs make it easier to go through hardships, even make them pleasant. Man can find a strong support in God and an encouraging consolation in His Name. If you have no belief in Him, then there is no alternative but to depend upon yourself. It is not child’s play to stand firm on your feet amid storms and strong winds. In difficult times, vanity, if it remains, evaporates and man cannot find the courage to defy beliefs held in common esteem by the people. If he really revolts against such beliefs, we must conclude that it is not sheer vanity; he has some kind of extraordinary strength. This is exactly the situation now. First of all we all know what the judgement will be. It is to be pronounced in a week or so. I am going to sacrifice my life for a cause. What more consolation can there be! A God-believing Hindu may expect to be reborn a king; a Muslim or a Christian might dream of the luxuries he hopes to enjoy in paradise as a reward for his sufferings and sacrifices. What hope should I entertain? I know that will be the end when the rope is tightened round my neck and the rafters move from under my feet. To use more precise religious terminology, that will be the moment of utter annihilation. My soul will come to nothing.”

Kangana is a rabid Hindu fanatic

Kangana and Mumbai city government are at odds over a petty issue

the Mumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) demolished her office

she was quick to invoke Muslim Mughal ruler Babur/Ram Mandir

she claimed her office was Ram Mandir (Lord Rama’s temple)

and the BMC was Babur, the person who started the Mughal dynasty

it’s a strange thing for her to say

not much should be expected from a history-ignorant person

Hindu zealots demolished the 16th century Babri Masjid in 1992

they claimed that it was built on the birthplace of Hindu deity Rama

the Indian Supreme Court sided with the Modi government

a mythological god Rama is going to get a new Ram Mandir soon

Shiv Sena, which runs Mumbai, is a thuggish Hindu nationalist party

Shiv Sena is a regional party and had a fall out with Modi’s BJP

she vented her anger at Maharashtra Shiv Sena Chief Minister

“Uddhav Thackeray, ‘tujhe kya lagta hai‘ (what do you think)?. You think you have taken a huge revenge by destroying my house in collusion with the movie mafia. Today my house is destroyed, tomorrow it will be your ego. The wheels of time keep changing, she said in a video message in Hindi, referring to the chief minister in the informal tu’ rather than the more respectful aap’.”

at any other time, she wouldn’t have said the above words – no way

now it’s that she has the full support of India’s central government

and she’s provided with Y Plus Security, 10 armed commandos 24-hours!

one wonders, for what? she has not been threatened in any way

Modi has invited her mother to join his party, Bhartiya Janata Party

politics politics politics …

Vishal should read the following paragraph of Bhagat Singh

then take any crap coming out of Kangana’s mouth

and compare both of those, and

I hope he learns something

“Those who are well versed in the philosophy of Jurisprudence relate three of four justifications for the punishment that is to be inflicted upon a wrong-doer. These are: revenge, reform, and deterrence. The Retribution Theory is now condemned by all the thinkers. Deterrent theory is on the anvil for its flaws. Reformative theory is now widely accepted and considered to be necessary for human progress. It aims at reforming the culprit and converting him into a peace-loving citizen. But what in essence is God’s Punishment even if it is inflicted on a person who has really done some harm? For the sake of argument we agree for a moment that a person committed some crime in his previous birth and God punished him by changing his shape into a cow, cat, tree, or any other animal. You may enumerate the number of these variations in Godly Punishment to be at least eighty-four lack. Tell me, has this tomfoolery, perpetrated in the name of punishment, any reformative effect on human man? How many of them have you met who were donkeys in their previous births for having committed any sin? Absolutely no one of this sort! The so called theory of ‘Puranas’ (transmigration) is nothing but a fairy-tale. I do not have any intention to bring this unutterable trash under discussion. Do you really know the most cursed sin in this world is to be poor? Yes, poverty is a sin; it is a punishment! Cursed be the theoretician, jurist or legislator who proposes such measures as push man into the quagmire of more heinous sins. Did it not occur to your All Knowing God or he could learn the truth only after millions had undergone untold sufferings and hardships? What, according to your theory, is the fate of a person who, by no sin of his own, has been born into a family of low caste people? He is poor so he cannot go to a school. It is his fate to be shunned and hated by those who are born into a high caste. His ignorance, his poverty, and the contempt he receives from others will harden his heart towards society. Supposing that he commits a sin, who shall bear the consequences? God, or he, or the learned people of that society? What is your view about those punishments inflicted on the people who were deliberately kept ignorant by selfish and proud Brahmans? If by chance these poor creatures heard a few words of your sacred books, Vedas, these Brahmans poured melted lead into their ears. If they committed any sin, who was to be held responsible? Who was to bear the brunt? My dear friends, these theories have been coined by the privileged classes. They try to justify the power they have usurped and the riches they have robbed with the help of such theories. Perhaps it was the writer Upton Sinclair who wrote (Bhagat Singh is referring to Sinclair’s pamphlet ‘Profits of Religion’ – MIA transcriber) somewhere “only make a man firm believer in the immortality of soul, then rob him of all that he possesses. He will willingly help you in the process.” The dirty alliance between religious preachers and possessors of power brought the boon of prisons, gallows, knouts and above all such theories for the mankind.”

B. R. Gowani can be reached at brgowani@hotmail.com

Comments are closed.