LE MONDE DIPLOMATIQUE
The Soviet–Finnish Non-Aggression Pact signed in Helsinki on 21 January 1932. On the left the Finnish foreign minister Aarno Yrjö-Koskinen, and on the right the Ambassador of the Soviet Union in Helsinki Ivan Maisky. PHOTO/Wikipedia
The inner game, through Soviet eyes
How excited the historian Gabriel Gorodetsky must have been to get access to 1,500 pages of hand-written notes by Ivan Maisky, the Soviet ambassador to London from 1932 to 1943. The document was exceptional for many reasons: the importance of Maisky’s diplomatic mission, which began just when Hitler’s expected accession to power heralded war in Europe; the situation in the Soviet Union, where purges would soon decimate armed forces officers and the diplomatic corps; and because of Maisky’s personality — though a revolutionary activist, he was a man of great character and culture (including writing plays in verse).
At first the Soviet government expected Maisky to be “a more accomplished diplomat and a less ardent communist” than his predecessor. In fact, he was to play a leading role in the European tragedy, suggesting ideas and diplomatic projects to his British counterparts, which he would attribute to them when reporting to Moscow. By building contacts even in the royal family and financial circles, Maisky hoped to dissipate the mutual distrust between Britain and Russia — each suspected the other of wanting to force it into conflict with Germany. The passage describing the “scandalous” complicity that developed between Churchill and Maisky on 16 November 1937 contrasts with the British establishment’s strong bias towards Germany at the time. The Munich Agreement, concluded the following year at a European conference to which the Soviet Union was not even invited, seemed to confirm Moscow’s suspicions on this point, and led to its strategic turnaround and the thunderbolt of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.
Gorodetsky’s commentary, written with the clarity that still distinguishes some of our best historians, reminds us that Stalinist terror discouraged Soviet diplomats from writing too much, especially from keeping a diary, in the 1930s. This makes Maisky’s diaries, on which Gorodetsky has worked for the last 15 years, all the more precious — in fact a unique document. They are a record of the efforts of a Soviet diplomat who — even when he feared being recalled to Moscow for consultation, risking execution or internment like a fair number of his colleagues (62% of Soviet diplomats were victims of the purges) — went on trying to reconcile his country’s interests with those of the major western powers. Reading them, it is clear this was not always easy.
Churchill, royalty and appeasement
16 November 1937
Today Agniya and I attended the ‘state banquet’ given by George VI in honour of King Leopold of Belgium, who has arrived on a four-day visit. It was a banquet like any other. 180 guests, the entire royal family, members of government, ambassadors (but not envoys) and various British notables. We ate from gold plates with gold forks and knives. The dinner, unlike most English dinners, was tasty (the King is said to have a French cook). Two dozen Scottish ‘pipers’ entered the hall during the dinner and slowly walked around the tables several times, filling the palace vaults with their semi-barbarian music. I like this music. There is something of Scotland’s mountains and woods in it, of the distance of bygone centuries, of man’s primordial past. […]
Leopold conversed with Chamberlain, Hoare, Montagu Norman (governor of the Bank of England) and, from among the ambassadors, with Grandi, Ribbentrop and Corbin (1). There was an obvious orientation towards the ‘aggressor’ and the aggressor’s collaborator.
Le Monde Diplomatique for more