FERHAT KENTEL interviewed by NICOLA MIRENZI
“The Kurdish issue is an ancient one, dating back at least to the creation of the Turkish Republic in 1923,” Kentel explained. “The Turkish state has never recognized the Kurds as a specific minority belonging to the national population. This issue became radicalized above all after the 1980 coup d’état, when the torture and abuse suffered by Kurds resulted in the PKK’s taking up arms. For this reason,” said Kentel, “I believe that a great deal depends on the state’s policies. When the state becomes more intransigent, then so does the Kurdish movement. The point today is to understand whether this conflict will have a political outcome or continue on the path of violence.”
Kentel’s impression, however was that “the AKP government wishes to impose a unilateral solution,” which would make this problem “even more insoluble. I am pessimistic about the near future,” he confessed, “but optimistic for the long-term, because I believe that Turkish society has the ability to absorb conflicts and find ways to coexist.”
The Erdo?an government – now serving its third term – had openly envisaged the possibility of a pacification of the Kurdish conflict with the so-called “democratic initiative.” This raised hope, but also many concerns. And now, that reformist spirit no longer seems present. This is also perhaps the most unsuitable time for a loss of faith, just when Turkey is preparing to rewrite its constitution.
“The AKP’s attitude,” explained Kentel, “has changed radically since 34 PKK militants returned home in October 2009, a passage agreed upon with the government to mark the beginning of a peace process. But these militants, after crossing the Turkish-Iraqi border in Habur, were welcomed as heroes by thousands of Kurds, and the Turkish nationalist core reacted very harshly. The nationalists said that the PKK was celebrating its victory because of Erdo?an and that what was taking place was a real humiliation for the Turkish Republic. This rejection of the democratic option has led the AKP government to step back from its readiness for the peace process, and since then I believe there has been further change. The AKP was afraid and did not have the strength to continue on its path, and so the state’s traditional mentality re-emerged within the AKP. From then on, the AKP has tried to corner the PKK, attempting to force it to surrender. It is very unlikely that this will happen, since the PKK does not consider surrender an option. And that is where we stand today. There is still room for some manoeuvring, but one cannot say whether peace or war will prevail.”
Reset Doc for more