The language trap

by MARYAM TAMOOR

This language trap assumes sombre gravity in today’s era

Language seems just a word, but it shapes us, our conduct, our relationships, and our worldview of the beings. What is language, after all? A combination of words, but where do the words come from? And how do some of these words evolve into “terms” that encapsulate and convey a certain meaning? More importantly, who defines these terms? And what happens when these terms become a part of world discourse and are embraced uncritically by the 8.2 billion population across the globe? Once part of the worldwide daily lexicon, these terms carry immense weight. As Judith Butler would say, words are ‘performative’, implying that language does not just describe, it enacts reality.

Nietzsche identified language as a ‘mobile army of metaphors’, and Foucault went a step ahead and described language as a part of discourse, defining terms treated as truth and knowledge. Knowledge, for him, has a direct nexus with power. Whoever coins and defines the ‘terms’ embodies a power structure, shaping the social reality we reside in. Just take the linguistic framing of two similar yet different terms — Antisemitism and Islamophobia — which exemplify these loaded concepts that bend the minds with their esoteric conception and twist the tongues with their phonetics.

Both terms encapsulate, albeit in a varied manner, hatred or prejudice against certain religious communities. However, framed in a way that one is identified as a direct assault on one religious populace, while the other is cast as a psychological phenomenon, a ‘phobia’, a fear of people belonging to a religion or belief system. Not coincidence but choreography. These terms lay bare the ‘discursive power’ of terms and open windows to their historical trajectories while organising prejudices and hostilities into consciously constructed categories.

Another aspect that adds an extension to this language trap is the endless pursuit of labelling. Why is there a need to put labels and branding on something when, even to the naked eye, it can be seen as either wrong or right? Though this branding makes the complexity of human affairs relatively simple, it also complicates and distorts. If it helps in navigating the world mosaic, it also divides.

The Express Tribune for more