Category: Uncategorized

Survival International, an international movement in defense of tribal people is accusing the makers of a controversial film of inciting racial hatred against Brazilian Indians. The charges are being made to mark the UN International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, March 21.

The film, “Hakani”, has been watched by more than 350,000 people on YouTube and claims to be the true story of a Brazilian Indian child buried alive by her tribe. Survival argues the film is faked, that the earth covering the children’s faces is “actually chocolate cake”, and that the film’s claim that infanticide among Brazilian Indians is widespread is false.

“People are being taught to hate Indians, even wish them dead,” says Survival’s director, Stephen Corry, in an interview about “Hakani”. “Look at the comments on the YouTube site, things like, “So get rid of these native tribes. They suck”, and, “Those amazon mother f***ers burying (sic) little kids, kill them all.”

“The film focuses on what they claim happens routinely in Indian communities, but it doesn’t,” Corry says. “Amazonian infanticide is rare. When it does happen… it is the mother’s decision and isn’t taken lightly. It’s made privately and secretly and is often thought shameful, certainly tragic.”

“Hakani” was directed by David Cunningham, the son of the founder of an American fundamentalist missionary organization called “Youth with a Mission”, which has a branch in Brazil known as Jocum. Corry argues that the missionaries try to downplay their involvement in the film.
“You’re invited to give money to UNKF, but you aren’t told what the initials mean (it’s part of the mission),” Corry says. “The evangelical involvement is not mentioned at all. Even if you download the full film, the credits are unreadable, so you can’t tell who is behind it.”

Corry says the film is part of the missionaries’ campaign to pressure Brazil’s government to pass a controversial bill, known as “Muwaji’s law”. This would force Brazilian citizens to report to the authorities anything they think is a “harmful traditional practice” – a law which would “foster witch-hunts”, “roll Brazil back centuries” and “could bring catastrophic social breakdown”.

Read More

‘Hakani’ is a film produced by the American fundamentalist missionary organisation Youth With a Mission.

It claims to be the “true story” of a Brazilian Indian child called Hakani who was supposedly buried alive by her tribe, the Suruwaha.
In fact, the film was faked – and even the missionaries who produced it ‘admit there is no way to verify what they say happened‘.

Hakani – paving a road to hell
In this Q&A, Survival’s director Stephen Corry explains why Survival is against Hakani.

Extracts:

You object to the film ‘Hakani’. Why?
Stephen Corry: It’s faked. It puts together footage from many different Indian tribes and uses trick photography to make its point. It wasn’t filmed in an Indian community, the earth covering the children’s faces is actually chocolate cake, and the Indians in the film were paid as actors.

The filmmakers say it’s a re-enactment, not a fake. How do you respond?
Stephen Corry: It’s presented as entirely real. The opening title of the complete film reads, ‘A true story’, and only at the very end is the viewer told it’s a re-enactment. The trailer, which has been seen by far more people, doesn’t mention it at all. If it were broadcast here, that would be mandatory.
If [the infanticide] happened as portrayed, it’s an extraordinary isolated case. After decades of working in Amazonia, we know of no Indian peoples where parents are told to kill their children. It just doesn’t happen.

Why oppose the film if it’s just trying to stop infanticide?
Stephen Corry: The film and its message are harmful. They focus on what they claim happens routinely in Indian communities, but it doesn’t. It incites feelings of hatred against Indians. Look at the comments on the YouTube site, things like, ‘So get rid of these native tribes. They suck’, and, ‘Those amazon mother f—-ers burrying (sic) little kids, kill them all’. The filmmakers should be ashamed of all the harm this film is doing to the people they are trying to help.
It’s propaganda to bolster the evangelical campaign for a very dangerous principle, the so-called Muwaji law, which has been presented to the Brazilian Congress.

What’s that?
The Muwaji law focuses on what it calls ‘traditional practices’ and says what the state and citizens must do about them. It says that if anyone thinks there is a risk of ‘harmful traditional practices’, they must report it. If they don’t, they are liable to imprisonment. The authorities must intervene and remove the children and/or their parents. All this because someone, anyone, a missionary for example, claims there is some risk.

http://www.survival-international.org/about/hakani

Read the full interview here

By Jagmohan Singh

India celebrated the International Women’s Day in an unparalleled way. The gritty activist Irom Chanu Sharmila who was released on 7th March was re-arrested on the afternoon of 8th March –International Women’s day, after spending barely 20 hours with her family and friends. She is again in the Jawaharlal Nehru Hospital from where she was released.

Despite her failing health and young age, the never-say-die Sharmila continues to taunt the Indian state for abrogation of the provisions of the draconian anti-people provisions of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act in Manipur and other parts of the North-east in India.
Though released intermittently for few days and weeks during her 8 long years in prison, she has continued her struggle while being incarcerated under charges of attempted suicide. As was expected, even though there is no ground for the government to continue with her detention, but as she continues to be on fast, for repeal of the AFSPA Act, 1958 she has been imprisoned again for attempted suicide because the government of India seems to be in no mood to relent.
The Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958, which has been in force in the North east for more than five decades, is a breach of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The sweeping powers under the law, including the power to shoot to kill on mere suspicion and the blanket impunity granted to the armed forces has resulted in heinous human rights violations including rape and extrajudicial murders. According to estimates by human rights bodies thousands of innocent Manipuris have been killed over the years and many are still under illegal detention of the armed forces.
It does not shame India –‘the largest democracy of the world’ that the UN Human Rights Committee, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the UN Committee on Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Committee on the Right of the Child have condemned AFSPA and urged India on many occasions to remove it from the statute.

It is sad but not surprising that the mainstream Indian media not omitted news of her arrest and her re-arrest. Much of civil society was silent leaving only the Delhi-based Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR) to condemn her re-arrest by the Manipur police as they were unwilling to allow her to address a meeting of the Apunba Manipur Kanba Ima Lup (Mothers Union to Save Manipur) to observe International Women’s Day.

Read More
(Submitted by Michelle Cook)

Geneva, 19 Feb (Kanaga Raja) — Sixteen public health, consumer and development groups have sent separate letters to the heads of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) voicing their concerns over recent seizures by Dutch customs authorities of Indian generic drugs shipped through the Netherlands en route to Brazil, Colombia and Peru.

In their letter dated 18 February to WHO Director-General Dr Margaret Chan, the NGOs asked her to “immediately undertake an assessment of the risks to public health programs presented by such seizures and any anti-goods-in-transit provisions that exist in current or proposed trade agreements, including those relating to anti-counterfeiting initiatives.”

In conducting the assessment, the WHO is asked to “interview developing country governments, UN agencies and other entities engaged in the trans-border delivery of generic medicines to developing countries, to fully document the extent to which medicines in transit are at risk regarding seizure or liability for infringement.”
In a separate letter to WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy, the groups called on him to “explore with the European Union the extent to which its customs rules and provisions in trade agreements present risks to goods in transit, and undermine the commitments made in 2001 in the Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health concerning access to medicines.”

The sixteen non-governmental organizations that signed both the letters are BUKO Pharma-Kampagne; Consumers International; Consumers Union; Essential Action; HAI Africa; HAI Asia Pacific; HAI Europe; HAI Global; HAI Latin America and Caribbean; Health GAP; Iqsensato; Knowledge Ecology International; Medico International; Oxfam International; Third World Network; and U. S. PIRG.
“In a world with territorial patent rights, it is important that the rules for ‘goods in transit’ permit the transport of medicines from places where they can be made to places where they will be used. The Dutch seizures have drawn attention to this issue, as has the recent disclosure of MSF that they regularly transport and temporarily store medicines in Europe, in route to users in developing countries. We expect the leaders of the WHO and the WTO to lead on this issue,” said James Love of Knowledge Ecology International.

“It is time that the World Health Organization, the institution that we look to for a lead in international health and development gave strong and clear guidance on the interpretation of international trade agreements that so adversely affect health. The health of millions of people worldwide who depend on life-saving quality assured generic medicines will be in jeopardy unless action is taken now by the World Trade Organization to give clear guidance to its Members on goods in transit. This situation cannot be allowed to continue,” said Tim Reed of HAI Global.

In their letter to WHO Director-General Dr Chan, the groups said that in recent years there has been a flurry of activity regarding new trade agreements and rules to enforce patents and intellectual property rights. One important aspect of those rules are measures that concern “goods in transit.” Under some legal traditions and consistent with WTO rules, goods in transit are exempt from normal restrictions associated with patents or other intellectual property rights, when en route to a market where the use is legitimate.

“This approach is not uniform, however, as illustrated recently by several seizures of medicines by Dutch customs officials,” said the letter to Dr Chan.

The groups noted that the Dutch cases involved medicines manufactured in India, and then shipped to Brazil, Colombia and Peru, via the Netherlands. The medicines were seized by Dutch customs officials.

Citing industry reports, the letter noted that at least four cases of Indian generic medicines in transit in the Netherlands were seized by Dutch customs authorities from October 15, 2008 to December 12, 2008: Clopidogrel Bilsulphate API (to Colombia); Olanzapine 10 mg Tabs (to Peru); Rivastigmine 3 mg Tabs (to Peru); and Losartan – API (to Brazil).

According to the manufacturers, all products were legitimate generics and did not violate any patent rights in the exporting or the importing countries.

The groups said that the seizure of the shipment containing Losartan active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) destined for Brazil was made in connection with a complaint filed by Merck, as the licensee of European patents and Dutch Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs), pursuant to Dutch law and the procedures set out in EU Regulations. In the case of the Clopidogrel Bilsulphate API shipments to Colombia, the Dutch customs authorities reportedly asserted the generic APIs were counterfeits, and Sanofi Aventis sought destruction of the goods.

The letter to Dr Chan said that the European Union is currently seeking very aggressive provisions regarding customs procedures in a number of proposed bilateral and regional trade agreements. The topic of provisional measures is also a key element in the secret negotiations for a new Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).
According to some reports, said the NGO letter, there are proposals in the ACTA negotiations to require the seizure of goods that infringe on patents, even for goods in transit. Whether intentional or not, additional risks to goods in transit are also found in the International Medical Products Anti Counterfeiting Taskforce (IMPACT)’s “Principles and Elements for National Legislation against Counterfeit Medical Products” and World Customs Organization’s “Provisional Standards Employed by Customs for Uniform Rights Enforcement (SECURE).”

Read More

By bringing the benefits and the knowledge of science to their people, Haseena and Tajunnisa have helped secure the future for the resources on which their families depend. Their home, Agatti, has, now become a model, writes Papri Sri Raman.

10 March 2009 – Kavaratti (WFS) – On January 29, Haseena and Tajunnisa, two young women from the beautiful Agatti island in Lakshadweep, received the 2008 Earth Heroes ‘Young Naturalist’ awards, given annually by ‘Sanctuary’ magazine in collaboration with the Royal Bank of Scotland. This unusual recognition came to these women, who are in their 20s, for their spectacular effort in mobilising a fishing community to become the keepers of nature.

Their story began five years ago, when the Mumbai-based Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) was entrusted with the job of studying the giant clam in the waters off Lakshadweep’s west coast.
Lakshadweep is India’s smallest Union Territory, beginning about 250 kilometres west off the Kerala coast. It comprises 12 atolls, three reefs and five submerged banks. There are 36 tiny islands on these sub-marine banks, with a total area of just about 32 sq. kilomtres.
The islands are scattered and remote, each fringed by white coral sand and shallow lagoons protected by reef walls. They are the only coral islands in India. Ten of these are home to about 60,000 people. The island group’s Gross Domestic Product from coconut, tuna, tourism, and sea-faring touches almost Rs.100 million, with the tuna canning factories concentrated on the Minicoy Island, the second largest and southern-most among the islands of the Lakshadweep archipelago.

More than 40,00,000 tons of tuna is caught in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans every year. In 2004, the Federal Drug Authority (FDA) frowned upon the intake of excessive tuna by pregnant women, nursing mothers and children, as it is believed to contain a large quantity of mercury. Light tuna, low in mercury content, is found off the Lakshadweep coast and this is now a thriving industry.
Tuna, a very large fish, feeds on small bait-fish, like minnow and anchovy. The availability of bait-fish is an indicator of the concentration of tuna in an area. Giant clams, too, live in association with bait-fish. The giant clam also harvested for food and as a curio, is listed as a ‘vulnerable’ species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

“The BNHS-lead International Marine Protected Area project (funded by the Darwin Initiative) was to study the giant clam and try and develop conservation strategies for it, as also for bait and tuna off the Agatti coast by developing a community-managed reserve,” says Deepak Apte, Assistant Director, BNHS. Apte, who is associated with the project, recently addressed a gathering of the International Collective in Support of Fishworkers in Chennai, which met to discuss the viability of India’s marine protected areas.

Read More

By Enrique Gili

SAN DIEGO, California, Mar 22 (IPS) – The San Diego Latino Film Festival is perhaps the biggest little film festival most people outside of Southern California have never heard of.

Big because the festival showcases the vast array of talent living on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border, and small because the commercial appeal of Spanish-speaking films in the U.S. market is almost negligible.

Nonetheless, the festival attracts a diverse crowd eager to create their own space in modern cinema. An estimated 20,000-plus people attend the festival over the course of a two-week period from Mar. 12 through Mar. 22.

Now in its 16th season, the festival is the brainchild of Ethan Van Thillo, executive director of the Media Arts Centre San Diego, a city-wide nonprofit organisation dedicated to promoting technical skills and media literacy in underserved communities.

The festival began modestly, showing student films in improvised spaces and later growing into its present format located in a multiplex movie theatre near downtown San Diego. This year, the festival screened 173 entrants, including feature-length films, shorts, and documentaries, from as far afield as Argentina and nearby as Tijuana, Mexico.

Sales are brisk at the box office, attracting a large crowd waiting in eager anticipation to see movies ranging in spectrum from light comedic fare to prison dramas. “We have to offer something for everyone,” Van Thillo said.

“We’ve seen a lot of great work come out of film schools in Mexico, Argentina and Spain,” he explained, observing the career arc of directors who have presented at the festival in prior years and are now returning to the festival with feature-length projects.

He’s showcased the early films of Alfonso Cuaron (Y Tu Mama Tambien) and Guillermo del Toro (Pan’s Labyrinth), among others. Both Mexican-born filmmakers have matured into movie-making powerhouses working in their native country and abroad.

This year, Carlos Cuaron, Alfonso’s bother and co-writer of “Y Tu Mama Tambien”, has returned with “Rudo y Cursi” in the hopes of having similar success.

Standouts include Sundance favourite “Sin Nombre”, a border thriller, and “The Garden”, an award-winning documentary set in Los Angeles that follows a Mexican-American community’s effort to protect an urban farm from development.

The San Diego Latino film festival, the second largest in the country, has become an essential stopping point for Hispanic filmmakers seeking welcoming audiences.

“I got the film bug early,” said film director Javier Chapa, a fifth generation Texan of Mexican-American ancestry, who was accompanied by his multicultural cast and crew to screen the premier of “Pepe & Santos Vs. the United States”, a light-hearted comedy set in Brownsville, Texas about the misadventures of day labourers in their efforts to own a house.

Making the movie, Chapa had an epiphany. “I thought, why don’t we celebrate Hispanic culture through comedy?” he said. “Pepe & Santos” combines elements of a Capra-esque fable mixed with the socially conscious “El Norte.”

The film played to a predominantly Hispanic crowd grown accustomed to seeing negative portrayals of the immigrant experience. In the question-and-answer session that followed, more than one viewer felt compelled to thank Chapa for making a movie they and “our children could watch.”

In 50 years’ time, media anthropologists wishing to study the demographic shift currently taking place across the United States might look to Latino film festivals popping up around the United States. They can be found not just in warm-blooded cities such as Miami, Phoenix and Los Angeles, but urban outposts like Chicago and San Francisco.

As Hispanics emerge from their ethnic enclaves in search of greater job and economic opportunities, they are bringing their culture with them. In doing so, they are shaping the lucha libre that is U.S. pop culture.

At the film festival, the two cultures intertwine. Film geeks mingle with middle-class Hispanic families. Spanish freely mixes with English, often in tandem. The films are as diverse as the populations they portray.

According to the U.S. Census, Hispanics are 15 percent of the U.S. population. By 2050, they will make up one-third. In border states, Hispanics already belong to a minority- majority population that includes Asians and African-Americans.

Read More

US software giant Google says it has removed several images taken in British cities from its Street View software, after users raised privacy concerns.
Street View displays 360-degree ground-level images captured by roaming cars using digital photography equipment.
The cars began taking images last northern summer, and continue to capture images across the country, allowing the service to expand after its launch in London on Thursday.
Just 24 hours after its release in Britain, however, Google said it had removed several pictures, including ones that users found embarrassing, such as one of a man leaving a sex shop in central London’s Soho neighbourhood, or another one of a man vomiting outside a pub in the east of the British capital.
A spokeswoman for the American internet company declined to confirm the precise number of photos that were removed, but said it had been “less than expected”.
Individual internet users who do not want either their image or that of their home to be used in Street View can request it be taken off Google’s database by filling out an online form.
Google says it has developed sophisticated software that ensures that individual’s faces and vehicle licence plates are blurred.
After initially being launched in the United States in May 2007, Street View is now available in Australia, Britain, Japan, New Zealand, France, Spain, Italy and the Netherlands.
AFP
Read More

By NICHOLAS BAKALAR

British scientists have developed an online tool for predicting your risk of developing adult-onset diabetes.

The researchers examined medical records of more than 2.5 million people over 15 years, excluding patients who already had diabetes or whose records were incomplete. They found nine significant risk factors: age, ethnicity, body mass index, smoking status, socioeconomic level, family history of diabetes, diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, hypertension and use of steroid drugs.
They calculated the relative importance of each of these factors, and incorporated them into a formula, or algorithm, that quite accurately predicts the 10-year risk for Type 2 diabetes.

Their study was published online March 17 in BMJ, and there is an interactive Web version of the algorithm at http://www.qdscore.org/. Dr. Julia Hippisley-Cox, the lead author, said that two of its features — postal code and ethnicity — were specific to Great Britain, but that the algorithm will “give you a fairly accurate notion anyway,” even without specifying those two factors.

Dr. Hippisley-Cox, who is a professor of epidemiology at Nottingham University, added that for those who find they are at high risk, weight loss and exercise are essential. “Those are the interventions that have been tested,” she said. “If you play around with the obesity measure, you can see how your risk will change if you lose weight.”

Read More

HDI Oscars: Slumdogs versus millionaires

What does it mean to rank much better on GDP per capita than in the HDI, as we do? It means we have been less successful in converting income into human development, writes P Sainath.

19 March 2009 – It has been the night of the long knives for our burgeoning billionaire population. Its band has just been devastated, falling by more than half from 53 to 24. The latest Croesus Count, also known as the Forbes Billionaires list, makes that much clear. We also fell by two notches to the sixth rank in the list of nations with the most billionaires. Our earlier No. 4 slot being slyly usurped by the Chinese who clock in with 29. More mortifying, we are a rung below the Brits who’ve grabbed Perch number 5, with 25.

The net asset worth of India’s brightest and best has also shrunk by over a third from the time of the last Forbes scroll. By 2007, that worth had reached $335 billion. That is, 53 individuals in a population of one billion held wealth equal to almost a third of their nation’s GDP at the time. This year, that worth plunged to $107 billion. (A moment’s respectful silence in memory of the dear, departed billions seems in order.) But there is some comfort in that our team is still worth more than twice what its Chinese rivals are. And we even now have eight billionaires more than all the Nordic nations put together – though they boast the highest living standards in the world.
“Four Indians were among the world’s top ten richest in 2008, worth a combined $160 billion,” points out Forbes. Today, alas, “that same foursome is worth just $54 billion.” But the 29 Indian tycoons reduced to the penury of mere millionairehood should not lose heart. Forbes offers us these words of reassurance. “The winds of wealth can change quickly ? They may yet again blow favourably in the direction of these tycoons.” So what if the big balances fly at half mast briefly? There could be gales ahead.

Alongside this grim tragedy runs a slightly longer-term saga. India has fallen to 132 in the new rankings of the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI) for 179 nations. Each year since 1990, the U.N. Development Programme has brought us this index, as a part of its Human Development Report. The HDI “looks beyond GDP to a broader definition of well-being.” It seeks to capture “three dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy at birth). Being educated (measured by adult literacy and enrolment in primary, secondary and tertiary education). And third: GDP per capita measured in U.S. dollars at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP).”

Worst in a decade
In the Index of 2007-08, India ranked a dismal 128. Now we’re at 132. That is our worst ever grade on the Index this decade. It means, among other things, that little Bhutan, never once in the Forbes hall of fame, has trumped us in the new HDI rankings. The tiny Himalayan nation clocks in at 131. That is, a notch above its “second-fastest-growing-economy-in the-world” neighbour. Bhutan once languished amongst the bottom 15 nations in the U.N.’s HDI. It has never been among the world’s fastest growing economies.

At rank 132, India also lags behind war-ravaged Congo, Botswana, and Bolivia. (The last is often called Latin America’s poorest nation). The Occupied Territories of Palestine (torn by conflict for 60 years) are also ahead of us. Another neighbour – Sri Lanka – has been devastated by war for over two decades and has slipped a few notches. It still logs in at 104 – 28 rungs above India. Vietnam suffered casualties in millions in the war waged against it by the United States. Decades after, its agriculture is yet to recover from the planned destruction, lethal bombing, and the conscious use of deadly poisons. But Vietnam clocks in at 114. And China at 94 despite falling several places.

The bad news about the bad news is that these figures reflect the good news days. They relate to the year 2006. (The Sensex was booming. It breached the 10,000 and even 14,000-mark for the first time ever. The Indian economy also grew at 9.6 per cent in 2006-07 and 9.4 per cent in 2005-06.) Those were the glory days our 132nd rank is rooted in. The same period when we churned out 53 dollar billionaires. So the updated HDI numbers do not begin to capture the economic downturn. The picture will be even less pretty when those factors kick in.

They do capture, though, the revised purchasing power parity (PPP) estimates that clocked in by late 2007. These columns foretold this problem at the time. It was clear that if the Index was using the older PPP data, then “even our awful HDI performance could get worse” once those were revised. (India’s GDP per capita (PPP) fell from $3452 to $2489 with the new data.)

And yet, we’d be even lower down than rank 132 but for our showing on the GDP-per capita front. Even now, our rank on that front is six notches higher than our HDI rank. It makes us look better than we are. For instance, in making out the current rankings, U.N. researchers point out that the GDP per capita data for 2006 “caused India to rise one place.” But “new data (for 2006) on life expectancy caused India to fall one place.” India then also fell two more places as two more nations – Montenegro and Serbia – joined the list. Both fared better than we did. We fell a further two places “as a result of revised PPP estimates.” That’s how we ended up four slots below our last rank.

What does it mean to rank much better on GDP per capita than in the HDI, as we do? It means you have been less successful in converting income into human development. Our GDP per capita rank is six rungs above our HDI rank. Vietnam’s HDI rank of 114 is 15 rungs above its GDP per capita rank. Unlike us, Vietnam has – despite awful historic handicaps – converted its wealth into human development far better.
Cuba logs in at 48, thus breaking into the top 50 nations in the HDI. (While India firms up its place in the bottom 50.) That’s seven places above wealthy Saudi Arabia, whose per capita GDP is three times higher than Cuba’s. In that ranking, Saudi Arabia is No. 35, towering above Cuba’s 88. But when it comes to human development, Saudi Arabia lags seven rungs below Cuba. Apart from suffering lower income, Cuba has lived under crippling sanctions for decades. Sanctions that have imposed huge constraints and high prices on all essentials. Yet, life expectancy at birth in Cuba is now 77.9 years. That’s almost the same as the U.S. (78). And about 14 years better than India’s 64.1.

Meanwhile, the U.S. has logged its worst rank ever, falling to 15 from 12. Between 1995 and 2000, the U.S. was always in the top 5, even staying at rank 2 for a couple of years. Like with India, its decline in HDI has come in the very years seen as its best, the Golden Age of the Free Market. The Nirvana point of neo-liberalism. A year into the economic reforms, India in 1992 ranked 121 among 160 nations then covered by the Index. Today, India is at 132 among 179 nations. Straight comparisons across that time are hard as the Index has changed in numbers and methodology. But the trend is clearly not joyous.

Steady decline
The HDI figures since 2002 signal a steady decline in the nation’s conversion of wealth into human development – even as the numbers of its billionaires and millionaires doubled and trebled. Now the billionaires have shrunk in number, but not the slumdogs. There are at least 836 million Indians living on less than Rs.20 a day, as the government’s own report told us in 2007. Over 200 million of those get by on less than Rs.12 daily. And those are pre-downturn numbers, too. Maybe, we need a new Forbes 500 list – naming the world’s 500 poorest citizens. Who could beat us on that one?

P Sainath
19 Mar 2009

P. Sainath is the 2007 winner of the Ramon Magsaysay award for Journalism, Literature, and Creative Communication Arts. He is one of the two recipients of the A.H. Boerma Award, 2001, granted for his contributions in changing the nature of the development debate on food, hunger and rural development in the Indian media.
http://www.indiatogether.org/2009/mar/psa-forbes.htm